Ранее Путин в разговоре с Трампом рассказал об успешном продвижении Вооруженных сил (ВС) России в зоне проведения специальной военной операции (СВО). Кроме того, российский лидер положительно оценил посреднические усилия главы Белого дома по урегулированию украинского кризиса.
This is an edition of Steven Levy’s Backchannel newsletter. Read previous newsletters here.
Getting Started。关于这个话题，WPS极速下载页提供了深入分析
‘Overall we are moving in the right direction’
。关于这个话题，谷歌提供了深入分析
Nature, Published online: 24 February 2026; doi:10.1038/d41586-026-00561-5，更多细节参见超级权重
One is the enabling model, where space technology, as an intrinsic element enhancing national strategic nuclear deterrence, influences different stages of the nuclear strike chain. This could either strengthen one’s own nuclear force’s reconnaissance, early warning, and preemptive strike capabilities or weaken the opponent’s penetration and survival capabilities, thereby leading to nuclear strategic stability or instability. First, space technology can enable nuclear force reconnaissance and early warning, achieving strategic stability by preventing strategic surprise attacks, assessing the opponent’s nuclear capabilities, and monitoring nuclear arms agreements. Some scholars suggest that the advent of reconnaissance satellite mechanisms during the Cold War helped increase the transparency of U.S.-Soviet nuclear arms development, thereby enhancing arms race stability.3 Second, space technology can lower strategic stability by enabling attack-related information. Some scholars point out that U.S. use of space technology to empower global rapid strike systems may provoke anxiety among other space-faring nations, leading to asymmetric countermeasures that disrupt existing strategic stability rather than achieving “hegemonic stability.”4 Third, space technology’s enabling of defensive information can also lead to strategic instability. Scholars note that empowering ballistic missile defense systems with space technology could increase the willingness for preemptive nuclear strikes, reducing first-strike stability and undermining regional strategic stability.5